PTAB Metal strides into IPR to choose Apple movement for sanctions

Categories: By IPO Pakistan.

On August 22nd, a request was entered in the entomb partes survey (IPR) procedures at present progressing between Bellevue, WA-based advanced mixed media correspondences designer VoIP-Buddy and Cupertino, CA-based customer gadget monster Apple Inc. The request expelled the board of managerial patent judges (APJs) that had been settling the IPR, supplanting them with Vice president APJ Scott Boalick and Bad habit Boss APJs Jacqueline Bonilla and Michael Tierney.

This is the second time the board of APJs has been totally changed in this specific IPR continuing. Initially, the board had comprised of APJs Barbara Benoit, Lynne Pettigrew and Stacy Beth Margolies. Albeit no clarification was given (as is run of the mill with the PTAB) the board was changed half a month after we detailed that APJ Margolies had beforehand spoken to Apple in patent encroachment procedures in U.S. region court.

The second panel of APJs assigned to this case included APJs Josiah Cocks, Jennifer Meyer Chagnon and John Hudalla. This panel, which was assigned to the casein June 2017, was the panel that issued the final written decision entered last November, find that the petitioner Apple had not proven the challenged patent claims were invalid. This was the same panel sitting on the case through January 19th of this year, when the PTAB entered an order regarding VoIP-Pal’s discharge of its prior counsel in the case.

Interestingly, although the order notes that all three APJs on the second panel were involved in the call regarding the change of counsel, the order itself only lists APJs Cocks and Hudalla as presiding over the case. That discrepancy is not explained in the Order, and is sadly typical of the lack of transparency seen in PTAB decisions and Orders. In an Article III Court it is customary, if not absolutely expected, that when any procedural irregularities occur they are explained with at least a footnote. Notions of substantial fair play and justice require at least that modicum of an appearance of propriety.

It seems extraordinarily unusual for a tribunal — any tribunal — to change change judges for purpose of ruling on a sanctions motion. If the letters from VoIP-Pal’s CEO did actually constitute improper behavior, the best people to decide that issue would be the panel of APJs who were assigned to the case at the time the behavior took place. Unquestionably, the APJs that were presiding over the case are in the best position to determine whether sanctions are appropriate. Most of the challenged behavior occurred during the timeframe that APJs Cocks, Chagnon and Hudalla constituted the presiding panel. Only one of Sawyer’s letters was sent prior to the first panel change, and if that panel was in fact changed because APJ Margolies had a conflict of interest it would be inappropriate for that panel to consider the sanctions motion.
While highly unusual for the PTAB to switch judges in midstream without any explanation, this kind of action does happen. It is also why observers so confidently claim the procedures of the PTAB are arbitrary and capricious.
The USPTO has engaged in the stacking of APJ panels in order to achieve policy outcomes, APJ Margolies is not the only APJ to have sat on a case where there was a blatant conflict of interest, in fact APJ Matt Clement has decided several dozen cases involving Apple, who he formerly represented. The PTAB also rather effectively squashes dissenting opinions by requiring permission to dissent and recently after an APJ did dissent in favor of a patent owner he was mysteriously and without explanation removed from the panel. We also know that subordinate APJs assigned to cases engage in extra-judicial, deliberative conversations with superiors relating to cases and issues, a clear and flagrant violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which requires decisional independence.
Minus any explanation as to why the panel was recently changed in the VoIP-Pal/Apple IPR, this situation is yet another example of the lack of transparency issuing from the PTAB and will undoubtedly have the effect of making it look as though the PTAB’s decision in this case was preordained, no matter which side prevails in the motion for sanctions.
One may be tempted to argue that changing the panel to constitute such a high-ranking panel will ensure consideration by PTAB leadership who aren’t under any influence, but if the PTAB does not similarly treat future sanctions motions legitimate questions will be asked about why Apple received special treatment. Furthermore, the optics of using a panel including APJ Tierney in a case involving Apple will no doubt raise some eyebrows given that once a challenge has been instituted Tierney has overwhelmingly sided with Apple. Indeed, according to data collected by Lex Machina, never once has a final decision involving both Apple and APJ Tierney ever led to a finding that all claims remained valid, and only once has Tierney sat on a panel where at least one claim remained valid.
Maybe all the more charming, Tierney sat as an APJ on the IPR documented by Apple against VirnetX where Apple could get around the statute of impediments for recording an IPR. Should the PTAB give Apple’s assents movement there will without a doubt be some who will consider this to be a second extraordinary support done by Tierney for Apple’s benefit.


  1. That is very fascinating, You are a very professional
    blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and stay up for looking for extra of your great post.
    Additionally, I have shared your site in my social networks

  2. I am regular visitor, how are you everybody?
    This article posted at this website is in fact good.

  3. Do you have a spam issue on this blog; I also am a blogger, and I was curious about your situation; many of us have
    created some nice procedures and we are looking to swap methods with others, be
    sure to shoot me an email if interested.

  4. This information is priceless. Where can I find out more?

  5. Hello everyone, it’s my first pay a quick
    visit at this web page, and paragraph is genuinely fruitful in support of
    me, keep up posting these articles.

  6. I have been surfing online more than 2 hours today, yet
    I never found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough for me.
    Personally, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did,
    the web will be a lot more useful than ever before.

  7. We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community.
    Your web site offered us with valuable info to work on. You have done a formidable job and our whole community will be thankful to you.

  8. Hmm is anyone else having problems with the images on this blog loading?
    I’m trying to determine if its a problem on my end or
    if it’s the blog. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

  9. Excellent web site. A lot of useful information here. I am sending it to several
    friends ans additionally sharing in delicious. And certainly,
    thank you on your effort! cheap flights cheap flights

  10. Appreciate this post. Let me try it out. quest bars quest bars

  11. Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to assert
    that I acquire actually enjoyed account your blog posts.

    Anyway I’ll be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access
    consistently fast. scoliosis surgery scoliosis surgery

  12. I’m impressed, I must say. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both equally
    educative and amusing, and let me tell you, you’ve
    hit the nail on the head. The problem is an issue that not enough men and women are speaking intelligently about.
    I’m very happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this.
    scoliosis surgery scoliosis surgery

  13. Aw, this was an incredibly nice post. Taking the time and actual effort to create a very good article… but
    what can I say… I hesitate a whole lot and
    don’t seem to get nearly anything done. ps4 games ps4

  14. Why people still use to read news papers when in this technological globe all is presented on net?|

  15. I truly love your website.. Excellent colors & theme. Did you build this amazing site yourself?

    Please reply back as I’m planning to create my very own website and would love to find out where you
    got this from or exactly what the theme is named. Cheers!

  16. I am truly pleased to read this webpage posts which includes tons of valuable data, thanks for providing such statistics.|

  17. Hello! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers? I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on. Any recommendations?|

  18. Good post. I learn something totally new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon every day. It’s always useful to read articles from other authors and practice a little something from other websites. |

  19. This information is invaluable. When can I find out more?|

  20. Paragraph writing is also a fun, if you know after that you can write if not it is complicated to write.|

  21. Hello would you mind letting me know which hosting company you’re working with? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most. Can you suggest a good hosting provider at a reasonable price? Thank you, I appreciate it!|

  22. Great article, totally what I was looking for.|

Leave Comments

Contact Us

Monday – Saturday: 9 am to 6 pm
Sunday: day off