Should Mind Reading Technology Be Used in Court?

Categories: Technology

If a brain can be caught lying, should we admit that evidence to court? Here’s what legal experts think.

A man is charged with stealing a very distinctive blue diamond. The man claims never to have seen the diamond before. An expert is called to testify whether the brain responses exhibited by this man indicate he has seen the diamond before. The question is – should this information be used in court?

Courts are reluctant to admit evidence where there is considerable debate over the interpretation of scientific findings. But a recent study from researchers in the US has noted that the accuracy of such “mind reading” technology is improving.

There are various methods of detecting false statements or concealed knowledge, which vary greatly. For example, traditional “lie detection” relies on measuring physiological reactions such as heart rate, blood pressure, pupil dilation and skin sweat response to direct questions, such as “did you kill your wife?” Alternatively, a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach uses brain scans to identify a brain signature for lying.

However, the technology considered by the US researchers, known as “brain fingerprinting”, “guilty knowledge tests” or “concealed information tests”, differs from standard lie detection because it claims to reveal the fingerprint of knowledge stored in the brain. For example, in the case of the hypothetical blue diamond, knowledge of what type of diamond was stolen, where it was stolen, and what type of tools were used to effect the theft.

This technique gathers electrical signals within the brain through the scalp by electroencephalography (EEG), signals which indicate brain responses. Known as the P300 signal, those responses to questions or visual stimuli are assessed for signs that the individual recognises certain pieces of information. The process includes some questions that are neutral in content and used as controls, while others probe for knowledge of facts related to the offence.

The P300 response typically occurs some 300 to 800 milliseconds after the stimulus, and it is said that those tested will react to the stimulus before they are able to conceal their response. If the probes sufficiently narrow the focus to knowledge that only the perpetrator of the crime could possess, then the test is said to be “accurate” in revealing this concealed knowledge. Proponents of the use of this technology argue that this gives much stronger evidence than is possible to get through human assessment.

Memory detection technologies are improving, but even if they are “accurate” (however we choose to define that term) it does not automatically mean they will or should be allowed in court. Society, legislators and the courts are going to have to decide whether our memories should be allowed to remain private or whether the needs of justice trump privacy considerations. Our innermost thoughts have always been viewed as private; are we ready to surrender them to law enforcement agencies?

15 Comments

  1. Hi there everyone, it’s my first pay a quick visit at this web site, and article is really fruitful
    in favor of me, keep up posting these types of content.

  2. I am actually grateful to the owner of this web page who has shared this wonderful article at here.

  3. I constantly spent my half an hour to read this blog’s articles every day along with a mug of coffee.

  4. What a data of un-ambiguity and preserveness of valuable knowledge on the topic of unpredicted emotions.

  5. Wonderful blog! Do you have any helpful hints for aspiring writers?

    I’m planning to start my own site soon but I’m a little lost on everything.
    Would you propose starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option?
    There are so many options out there that I’m completely confused ..

    Any ideas? Thanks a lot!

  6. whoah this blog is magnificent i really like reading your
    articles. Keep up the great work! You understand, lots of individuals are looking round for this info,
    you can aid them greatly.

  7. Great beat ! I would like to apprentice at the same time
    as you amend your website, how could i subscribe
    for a weblog website? The account helped me a applicable deal.
    I have been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered
    bright transparent idea asmr https://app.gumroad.com/asmr2021/p/best-asmr-online asmr

  8. My brother suggested I might like this web site. He was once entirely right.
    This post truly made my day. You cann’t believe just
    how a lot time I had spent for this information! Thank you!
    quest bars http://tinyurl.com/49u8p8w7 quest bars

  9. wonderful post, very informative. I ponder why the opposite specialists of this sector do not
    realize this. You should proceed your writing.
    I am sure, you have a huge readers’ base already!
    cheap flights http://1704milesapart.tumblr.com/ cheap flights

  10. I like reading a post that can make men and women think.

    Also, thank you for allowing for me to comment! scoliosis surgery https://0401mm.tumblr.com/ scoliosis surgery

  11. Excellent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous
    to and you’re just too magnificent. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what
    you are saying and the way in which you say it.
    You make it enjoyable and you still take care of to
    keep it smart. I cant wait to read far more from you.
    This is actually a great site. quest bars https://www.iherb.com/search?kw=quest%20bars quest bars

  12. Wonderful article! We will be linking to this particularly great article
    on our website. Keep up the good writing.

  13. Stylish slippers, really well made with attention to detail, cosy, sturdy soles for outside wear etc etc.

  14. It didnt rain so I am not sure a out the waterproof but it seems to be sturdy, zipper great and had a protection flap over the zipper.

Leave Comments

Contact Us

Monday – Saturday: 9 am to 6 pm
Sunday: day off