US Supreme Court Kills Apple’s Attempt to Dodge $440 Million Judgment for VirnetX

Categories: Asma Raza

“The jury grant we got, and affirmed by Federal appointed authorities, is not exactly a fourth of one percent of the expense of an iPhone. We accept this sum is more than reasonable thinking about the significance of Internet security.” – VirnetX articulation


The Supreme Court today denied certiorari in Apple, Inc. v. VirnetX, Inc. et. al., an improvement that VirnetX said in an official statement spells “triumph” for the Internet security programming organization, following 10 years in length fight.

The basic judgment was conveyed in October 2017, when the U.S. Region Court for the Eastern District of Texas expanded the measure of harms to be paid by Apple from $302.4 million of every an earlier jury decision up to almost $440 million for Apple’s encroachment of licenses covering secure correspondences in applications like FaceTime.

Apple engaged the Federal Circuit, which gave a Rule 36 judgment in January 2019 avowing the locale court. In August 2019, the CAFC denied Apple’s solicitations for rehearing, and in October the Court denied resulting movements to abandon that request and stay issuance of the order for the situation. The proper command gave on October 8, making the Rule 36 judgment last, and Apple requested of the Supreme Court on December 27.

High Court Not Moved by “Expanding Loophole” Argument

Apple contended in its appeal that the Federal Circuit “flout[ed] over a time of principle from this Court requiring “apportion[ment]” of patent harms “for each situation,” conjuring Garretson v. Clark, 111 U.S. 120, 121 (1884). In Garretson, the Supreme Court held that “a patentee can’t recuperate the whole benefit from an encroaching item as harms except if ‘the whole estimation of the entire machine * is appropriately and lawfully owing to the licensed component.'”

The organization included that case law at the Federal Circuit in the course of the most recent five years has brought about the reception of a “vast escape clause” taking into account a pestilence of expanded harms grants.

However, VirnetX answered that Apple didn’t debate that it consolidated VirnetX’s innovation into its items, in this manner encroaching VirnetX’s licenses, and said that Apple was “imagining reasons and assumed legitimate principles the Federal Circuit never embraced”.

There is a different case pending among Apple and VirnetX in which the Federal Circuit requested a recalculation of harms not long ago, making the absolute remarkable judgment for VirnetX almost $1 billion.

Apple Must Pay Up

As per VirnetX, Apple consented to an arrangement on October 16, 2017 “stipulating Apple concurs that… Apple will pay any installments then due under the Judgment inside 20 days of consummation of any intrigue from the Judgment right now, well as any procedures looking for help from the Judgment under the steady gaze of the Supreme Court of the United States, and any remand procedures in the occasion the court of claims or Supreme Court awards Apple alleviation from the Judgment, or inside 20 days of the termination of the occasions for starting such investigative or Supreme Court procedures.”

“We believe Apple will respect the choices rendered by our courts and their regarded judges and respect a consent to submit to the court’s choice,” Kendall Larsen, VirnetX CEO and President, said in an announcement.

Larsen added:

“We are incredibly satisfied with the Supreme Court’s choice not to hear Apple’s writ of certiorari. It has taken us 10 long years, 4 fruitful jury preliminaries, 2 effective Appellate Court decisions and a great Supreme Court choice to arrive. We put stock in the reasonableness of the American equity framework and have consciously played by its standards regardless of how burdensome.

We are a little organization with significant security innovation. The innovators of that innovation have senior level situations at VirnetX. It has consistently been our goal to make our own items with our exclusive innovation. Sadly, when different organizations are utilizing your innovation without authorization, you should make a move to secure that organization resource.

We have consistently accepted that we were morally justified with our court activities against Apple. Four juries and endless appointed authorities concur. We accept that our innovation gives a significant security highlight in some Apple items, particularly the iPhone. The jury grant we got, and affirmed by Federal appointed authorities, is not exactly a fourth of one percent of the expense of an iPhone. We accept this sum is more than reasonable thinking about the significance of Internet security”.



  1. Very good post. I will be facing a few of these issues
    as well..

  2. My coder is trying to convince me to move to .net
    from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs.
    But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type on numerous websites for
    about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform.
    I have heard great things about
    Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into
    it? Any kind of help would be really appreciated!

  3. Have you ever considered writing an ebook or guest authoring on other websites?
    I have a blog centered on the same information you discuss and would love to
    have you share some stories/information. I know
    my audience would appreciate your work. If you’re even remotely interested,
    feel free to shoot me an e mail.

  4. I am regular visitor, how are you everybody? This article posted at
    this web page is genuinely pleasant.

  5. Magnificent beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend your website,
    how can i subscribe for a blog site? The account helped me
    a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright clear concept

  6. Hey! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any issues with hackers?
    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing a
    few months of hard work due to no backup. Do you have any methods to prevent hackers?

  7. I do believe all the ideas you have presented in your post.

    They are very convincing and can certainly work. Still, the posts are very quick for beginners.
    May you please prolong them a little from subsequent time?
    Thank you for the post. quest bars quest bars

  8. Hello, i feel that i saw you visited my website thus i got
    here to go back the choose?.I’m attempting to in finding
    issues to enhance my website!I guess its ok to use some of your ideas!!
    ps4 games ps4

  9. Peculiar article, totally what I was looking for. scoliosis surgery scoliosis surgery

  10. Aw, this was an exceptionally nice post. Finding the time and actual
    effort to generate a great article… but what can I
    say… I hesitate a lot and never seem to get anything done.
    scoliosis surgery scoliosis surgery

  11. Thanks for the good writeup. It if truth be told used to
    be a enjoyment account it. Glance complicated to more introduced agreeable from you!

    However, how could we keep in touch? cheap flights cheap flights

Leave Comments

Contact Us

Monday – Saturday: 9 am to 6 pm
Sunday: day off